cetpinhibition.org

Mechanisms

Oleate-induced negative surface charge on LDL blocks LTIP activity at ten micromolar while only fully suppressing CETP above twenty micromolar (J Lipid Res 2003)

Original title: CETP and lipid transfer inhibitor protein are uniquely affected by the negative charge density of the lipid and protein domains of LDL

J Lipid Res · · 6

Morton RE, Greene DJ

Lipoprotein surface charge affects cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity and its lipoprotein association, but how charge density of LDL's protein versus lipid domains affects CETP and its regulator, lipid transfer inhibitor protein (LTIP), was unclear. The authors modified the electronegativity of LDL's protein domain (acetylation) and surface lipid domain (oleate addition) and measured CETP and LTIP activity in LDL-only lipid transfer assays. CETP activity was stimulated by less than 10 microM oleate but completely suppressed above 20 microM; acetylation produced only mild CETP stimulation, and enhanced CETP binding did not correlate with activity. LTIP activity was completely blocked by about 10 microM oleate but only mildly suppressed by acetylation. The negative charge of LDL surface lipids, not protein, is a key regulator of both CETP and LTIP activity.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Lipoprotein surface charge influences cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity and its association with lipoproteins; however, the relationship between these events is not clear. Additionally, although CETP and its regulator, lipid transfer inhibitor protein (LTIP), bind to lipoproteins, it is not known how the charge density of lipoprotein protein and lipid domains influences these factors. Here, the electronegativity of the protein (by acetylation) and surface lipid (oleate addition) domains of LDL were modified. LDL-only lipid transfer assays measured changes in CETP and LTIP activities. CETP activity was stimulated by <10 microM oleate but completely suppressed by >20 microM. The same electronegative potential induced by acetylation mildly stimulated CETP. Modification-induced enhanced binding of CETP did not correlate with CETP activity. LTIP activity was completely blocked by approximately 10 microM oleate but only mildly suppressed by acetylation. LTIP binding to LDL was not decreased by oleate. Thus, the negative charge of LDL surface lipids, but not protein, is an important regulator of CETP and LTIP activity. Altered binding could not explain changes in CETP activity, suggesting that the extent of CETP binding is not normally rate limiting to its activity. Physiologic and pathophysiologic conditions that modify the negative charge of lipoprotein surface lipids will suppress LTIP activity first, followed by CETP.

mechanisms

Summary written by cetpinhibition.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 19 August 2026. Methods.