A showcase of accredited education on CETP inhibition, and an invitation to place programmes here.
Every programme below is somebody else's work, listed as an example of the format. This site does not host, accredit or endorse any of them.
Medscape Education2026
Accredited CME, on demand
An accredited activity on why a class written off after ILLUMINATE and ACCELERATE is being reconsidered. An example of the narrative-arc format, which suits a drug class whose history is the argument.
Medscape Education2026
Standing collection, continuously updated
A standing themed hub rather than a single activity. The closest existing model for a curated education shelf sitting beside a maintained evidence library.
Medscape Education2026
Accredited CME/CE, micro-lesson format
Short lessons on residual cardiometabolic risk and where novel CETP inhibition might address it. An example of the micro-lesson format: minutes rather than an hour, designed to be finished.
PACE-CME2025
Accredited CME, European programme
A European activity asking the practical question a clinician will ask on the day of approval: where does this sit relative to ezetimibe, bempedoic acid and the PCSK9 pathway. An example of a placement-focused programme.
Healio CME, cardiology2025
Accredited CME, on demand
A programme framing the class on its LDL-lowering claim rather than its HDL history, which is where the evidence now sits. An example of a publisher-run activity aligned to a specific mechanism story.
A reader arrives already looking for CETP. They are reading the ILLUMINATE entry, the Mendelian randomisation that rescued the mechanism, or the obicetrapib phase 3 results, when the question of what it means for their practice occurs to them. That is a better moment to meet an educational programme than an advertisement in a feed.
What makes it work is the library underneath: more than two thousand studies from 1978 to today, every outcomes trial the class has run, the five agents with the reason each one stopped, and the genetics that reframed the whole strategy. Education placed beside a maintained evidence base keeps returning readers long after a campaign ends.
This class cannot be taught in a single mechanism slide. The honest version requires four failures explained before the fifth drug makes sense, and a reader who has only been told the good news will not trust the source twice. Programmes that carry the arc, and sit next to a library where the failures are documented with the same care as the successes, are more credible than programmes that do not.
Accredited CME and CE, faculty-led video, congress round-ups, case series, slide decks and podcasts. Each carries its provider, its accreditation and its expiry date plainly. Independence is not negotiable: the library is written from published abstracts and stays editorially separate from anything placed here, and sponsored material is labelled as such on every page it appears.
To discuss placing a programme, get in touch through the About page.