HDL biology
Niacin plus laropiprant, but not fenofibrate, significantly lowers CETP and LCAT activity in type 2 diabetic patients with low HDL (Atherosclerosis 2015)
Original title: Remarkable quantitative and qualitative differences in HDL after niacin or fenofibrate therapy in type 2 diabetic patients
In a randomized, crossover intervention trial, thirty type 2 diabetic patients with low HDL received fenofibrate or niacin plus laropiprant as add-on therapy to simvastatin for 12 weeks each, compared with thirty nondiabetic patients with normal HDL as a baseline control group. Niacin plus laropiprant, but not fenofibrate, significantly increased HDL cholesterol, though neither treatment normalized HDL particle size or number. Niacin plus laropiprant increased apolipoprotein A-I but not apolipoprotein A-II, while fenofibrate produced the opposite effect. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) and lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase activities were significantly decreased only by niacin plus laropiprant, and platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase activity in HDL and plasma decreased with both agents, though neither treatment produced detectable antioxidant improvements.
Original abstract
HDL-increasing drugs such as fenofibrate and niacin have failed to decrease the cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. Drug-mediated quantitative and qualitative HDL modifications could be involved in these negative results. To evaluate the quantitative and qualitative effects of niacin and fenofibrate on HDL in patients with type 2 diabetes, a prospective, randomised controlled intervention trial was conducted. Thirty type 2 diabetic patients with low HDL were randomised to receive either fenofibrate (FFB) or niacin + laropiprant (ERN/LPR) as an add-on to simvastatin treatment for 12 weeks according to a crossover design. At the basal point and after each intervention period, physical examinations and comprehensive standard biochemical determinations and HDL metabolomics were performed. Thirty nondiabetic patients with normal HDL were used as a basal control group. ERN/LRP, but not FFB, significantly increased HDL cholesterol. Neither ERN/LRP nor FFB reversed the HDL particle size or particle number to normal. ERN/LRP increased apoA-I but not apoA-II, whereas FFB produced the opposite effect. FFB significantly increased Preβ1-HDL, whereas ERN/LRP tended to lower Preβ1-HDL. CETP and LCAT activities were significantly decreased only by ERN/LRP. PAF-AH activity in HDL and plasma decreased with the use of both agents. Despite their different actions on antioxidant parameters, none of the treatments induced detectable antioxidant improvements. ERN/LRP and FFB had strikingly different effects on HDL quantity and quality, as well as on HDL cholesterol concentrations. When prescribing HDL cholesterol increasing drugs, this differential action should be considered.
Summary written by cetpinhibition.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 19 August 2026. Methods.