cetpinhibition.org

Evacetrapib

No benefit with evacetrapib despite raising HDL 130% and cutting LDL 37%: is this the end of the road for the cetrapibs? (Expert Opin Pharmacother 2017)

Original title: No cardiovascular benefit with evacetrapib - is this the end of the road for the 'cetrapibs'?

Expert Opin Pharmacother · · 6

Doggrell SA

Torcetrapib and dalcetrapib, the earlier 'cetrapibs', failed to improve cardiovascular outcomes despite raising HDL cholesterol, yet the evacetrapib outcomes trial went ahead regardless. This review covers the lipid effects of evacetrapib, raising HDL by about 130% and lowering LDL by about 37%, against the failure of the ACCELERATE trial to show reduced cardiovascular outcomes. The author considers two explanations: that raising HDL cholesterol may simply not be beneficial in patients who already have coronary artery disease, or that evacetrapib carries toxic effects that offset any benefit. In the expert opinion of the author, incomplete understanding of the CETP-HDL-cardiovascular disease relationship, together with recent meta-analysis evidence that raising HDL does not improve outcomes in statin-treated patients, may explain why evacetrapib failed, compounded by a lack of preclinical exploration of off-target mechanisms across the whole cetrapib class before clinical trials began.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Increasing high-density lipoprotein(HDL) cholesterol levels predict improved cardiovascular outcomes. However, inhibiting cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) to increase HDL cholesterol, with the 'cetrapibs' (torcetrapib and dalcetrapib), did not improve cardiovascular clinical outcomes. Despite these findings, the clinical outcomes trial with evacetrapib continued. Areas covered: Treatment with evacetrapib increased the levels of HDL by ~130%, and decreased low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by ~37%. However, The Assessment of Clinical Effects of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibition with Evacetrapib in Patients at a High Risk for Vascular Outcomes (ACCELERATE) trial did not show reduced cardiovascular outcomes with this cetrapib. Evacetrapib may have failed because increasing HDL cholesterol may not be beneficial in the presence of coronary artery disease and/or it is possible that evacetrapib has toxic effects that counter any beneficial effects. Expert opinion: In addition to our understanding of the relationships between CETP, HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular disease being incomplete, recent meta-analysis evidence suggests that increasing HDL cholesterol does not improve cardiovascular outcomes in subjects taking statins, and this may explain the failure of evacetrapib. Also, the preclinical characteristics of the cetrapibs, especially off-target mechanisms, were not explored prior to clinical trial, and may have contributed to the failure of cetrapibs, including evacetrapib.

dalcetrapibevacetrapiboutcomes trialstorcetrapib

Summary written by cetpinhibition.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.