cetpinhibition.org

Obicetrapib

Network meta-analysis of 2,937 patients: obicetrapib outperforms anacetrapib on LDL-C, HDL-C and overall adverse events (Daru 2026)

Original title: Comparative efficacy of obicetrapib and anacetrapib in reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels: a network meta-analysis of clinical trials

Daru · · 7

Jaber AR, Abu Zayed J, Alabed Z, Zapen J, Ayesh H

A frequentist network meta-analysis of ten randomised controlled trials (2,937 patients) comparing obicetrapib and anacetrapib against placebo. Obicetrapib gave the largest LDL-C reduction (mean difference -33.63 mg/dL, 95% CI, -44.10 to -23.16) and HDL-C increase (mean difference 154.33 mg/dL, 95% CI, 132.73 to 175.93), outperforming anacetrapib on both measures. The two drugs reduced non-HDL-C, apoB and Lp(a) comparably; obicetrapib raised apoA1 and apoE more, while anacetrapib lowered triglycerides more effectively. Obicetrapib had the lowest risk of overall adverse events (risk ratio 0.69, 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.99) and ranked favourably for serious adverse events and discontinuation. An indirect comparison across trials that were not head-to-head.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Background: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors, specifically anacetrapib and obicetrapib, have shown strong lipid-modifying effects by lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and altering other lipid parameters. However, comparative evidence on their relative efficacy and safety is limited.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of anacetrapib and obicetrapib.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The protocol was registered at OSF ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VRP8Y ). The primary outcome was change in LDL-C; secondary outcomes included high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-HDL-C, total cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein (a), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), apolipoprotein AI (ApoAI), apolipoprotein E (ApoE), incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuation. A frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was performed using the netmeta package in R, with placebo as reference.

Results: Ten randomized controlled trials (2,937 patients) were included. Obicetrapib showed the most significant reduction in LDL-C (MD -33.63 mg/dL; 95% CI [-44.10, -23.16]) and the most significant increase in HDL-C (MD 154.33 mg/dL; 95% CI [132.73, 175.93]), outperforming anacetrapib. Both drugs comparably reduced non-HDL-C, ApoB, and Lp(a). Obicetrapib was associated with greater increases in ApoA1 and ApoE, while anacetrapib lowered triglycerides more effectively. Obicetrapib had the lowest risk of overall adverse events (RR 0.69; 95% CI [0.49, 0.99]) and ranked favorably for serious adverse events and discontinuation.

Conclusion: Both agents effectively reduced LDL-C levels, with obicetrapib demonstrating superior efficacy compared to anacetrapib. Additionally, both treatments demonstrated favorable safety profiles. These findings underscore the potential of CETP inhibitors as promising therapeutic options for patients with dyslipidemia.

anacetrapibHDL biologyLDL and apoBobicetrapibsafety

Summary written by cetpinhibition.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.