cetpinhibition.org

Outcomes trials

A meta-analysis of 62,565 patients confirms CETP inhibitors raise HDL cholesterol by 130 percent yet still fail to reduce cardiovascular events (J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2026)

Original title: Efficacy and safety of CETP inhibitors in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol · · 7

Milán RR, Jiménez Castellanos MS, Doníz Viveros AD, Yusufzai MO, Chiong Espinoza EE, Estela Fernández CA, Machado DA, Abbas MS, Šah H, Altamirano AA, Mahajan K

This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessed the efficacy and safety of CETP inhibitors versus placebo in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, searching PubMed, Embase, and Scopus and pooling results with random-effects models. Five RCTs involving 62,565 participants (31,698 receiving a CETP inhibitor) were included. Compared with placebo, CETP inhibitors showed no significant reduction in death from coronary heart disease (RR 0.91), unplanned coronary revascularization (RR 0.91), non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR 0.94), or stroke (RR 1.02), and no excess adverse-event risk (RR 1.00). In contrast, CETP inhibitors produced substantial lipid changes: HDL cholesterol rose by a mean difference of 130.82%, LDL cholesterol fell by 32.68%, apolipoprotein A1 rose by 45.04%, and apolipoprotein B fell by 17.26%. The findings confirm that CETP inhibitors produce substantial lipid modifications across the drug class but do not reduce major adverse cardiovascular events, underscoring the limits of surrogate lipid markers for predicting clinical benefit.

Read the paper (DOI)PubMed

Original abstract

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains a leading cause of death globally. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors have been proposed as a novel strategy for cardiovascular risk reduction, yet evidence remains inconsistent. PubMed, Embase and Scopus were searched for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing CETP inhibitors to placebo in patients with ASCVD. Random-effects models were used to pool risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Statistical analysis was performed using R software version 4.3.3. We included 5 RCTs involving 62,565 participants, of whom 31,698 (50.7%) received CETP inhibitors. Compared to placebo, CETP inhibitors showed no significant reduction in death from coronary heart disease (RR 0.91; 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.01), unplanned coronary revascularization (RR 0.91; 95% CI: 0.79 to 1.05), non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR 0.94; 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.02) and stroke (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.12). Also, no excess risk of adverse events was observed (RR 1.00; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.02). Conversely, HDL-C (MD + 130.82%; 95% CI: 121.49 to 140.15), LDL-C (MD -32.68%; 95% CI: -40.73 to -24.63), ApoA1 (MD +45.04%; 95% CI: 40.51 to 49.57) and Apo B (MD -17.26%; 95% CI: -20.51 to -14.00) showed significant improvement. CETP inhibitors produce substantial lipid modifications but do not reduce major adverse cardiovascular events, underscoring the limitations of surrogate lipid markers and the need for outcome-based validation of lipid-modifying therapies.

the classoutcomes trialssafety

Summary written by cetpinhibition.org from the published abstract; figures as published. Page updated 18 August 2026. Methods.